🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but very loyal friend. Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a struggle between a shuttered park, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their fate often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the government covers the expense of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has refused that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, problem solving and social skills indicate they are deeply intelligent creatures – something a former trainer learned directly.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She formed a special affection for a pair of whales with opposing temperaments.

“One whale accepted me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Both altered the way I view bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Her interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her time at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, succumbed. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility links to age-related causes, but which activists say points to the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a request for comment, but earlier stated: “The whales … get far superior health care and 24/7 attention than any individual in the UK, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was fired from the park in the spring following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the facility suspected information of the incident were leaked to the press and she was released soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left her and staff members in despair. She says the park’s warning to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any plans to put down even a one beluga would require “immense manpower”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs demands for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In late September, the nation’s government official turned down a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the request would have meant a perpetual life in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official wrote. “As society, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience authorize an transfer that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the minister’s comments reflect a wider misunderstanding of the circumstances of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As authorities attempt to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of food for Inuit communities.

A proposed protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has been highly debated. The planned location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a permanent answer for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the possibility of a refuge reflects a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, director of the plan, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|